Limited Time Offer: Get 2 Months of for only $5!






What is it?

How does it happen?

Why is it controversial?

How do we know it's true?

Who is this Darwin guy?

What trends are there?



Let's begin with what evolution is (and what it is not).


Evolution is the change in a population's genetic material over time.  

An individual cannot evolve.  Growth is not evolution.  Only a population can evolve.



How do we know that life evolves?


Let's look at some evidence:

Image result for fossil record evolution

The most often cited evidence is the fossil record.  This states that as you go back in time (by digging deeper in the earth or dating the fossils to confirm their age), the skeletons have changed over time.  Here it a horse's fossil record:

Image result for fossil record evolution

They grew bigger and lost otes over time.  They changed--they evolved.


We can compare the anatomy of organisms:

Image result for comparative anatomy evidence for evolution

This will show us which ones are more related evolutionarily.


Homologous structures are ones that are the same despite being used for different purposes:

Image result for homologous structures evidence for evolution


Analogous structures are used for the same purpose, but very different inside:

Image result for analogous structures evidence for evolution


Vestigial structures are left over anatomy:

Image result for vestigial structures evidence for evolution



We can compare embryos:

Image result for early embryo similarities evidence for evolution

Pretty similar early on.  But then:

Image result for comparative embryos evidence for evolution

This shows relationships that sometimes hide in the born creature.


We can compare DNA and get a clearer picture of relationships.



But the only evidence that can be directly observed and controled in a lab setting is bacterial resistance.  I have caused a population of bacteria to change over time by adding antibiotics to the dish and only allowing the resistant ones to survive and reproduce.  Thus, all the offspring were resistant.  The population went from having a small fraction resistant to having 100% resistant over night.  I caused evolution!



So, if we believe that populations evolve over time, the next important question is how?  What drives this change?


The first person to pose a mechanism for this was a brilliant scientist named Lamarck.  

Image result for lamarck

Unfortunately, his theory was laughable.  He proposed that organisms strived to their environment and the traits they acquired were passed on to their offspring.  For example, the proto-giraffe stretched its neck to reach higher leaves and passed the long neck onto its babies who continued stretching their necks and over time we got giraffes with long necks:

Image result for lamarck

The was laughable because acquired traits are not passed along (if I lose a finger in an accident and then have a baby, it will not be born with 9 fingers).

Now (with epigenetics), we are discovering that he may have been on to something, but more on that later in the DNA unit.


Around this same time, other smart people were making contributions. 

A geologist named Lyell showed that the world was much, much older than previously believed.

An economist named Malthus showed that organisms way over produce offspring and the vast majority of them die off (a single maple tree can make millions of seeds each year!).  The environment kills them off.

A zoologist named Cuvier discovered lots of homologous, analogous, and vestigial structures.


This paved the way for this man:

Image result for darwin

Charles Darwin.  

He was a naturalist / scientist who traveled around the world on the HMS Beagle and noted lots of similarities and diversity and began to pick up on the driving factor--the environment.

In his view, there is variation within every population.  Organisms overproduce offspring.  The environment pressures the organisms.  The ones best adapted to their environment live better (become stronger and healthier) and reproduce more, thus passing on their genetic material in a higher frequency than their less adapted siblings.  Over many generations the frequency of the whole population shifts to show the adaptation.

If the pressure is strong enough, the evolution can happen quickly. 

This has been summed up as "Survival of the Fittest."



What have been the trends in evolution?

Single celled --> multicelled  [why?]

Tiny --> large [why?]

Sea dwelling --> land dwelling [why?]

Anaerobic --> aerobic [why?]




Other terms to know:

Species - a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring

Population - all the organisms of the same species in a geographic region

Adaptation - a change that better fits an environment

Gene pool - the total variety in a population

Competition - when resources are scarce and some must die

Fitness - how adapted to their environment an organisms is

Speciation - the process by which new species arise

Genetic drift - non-pressured evolution

Coevolution - when two or more organisms evolve together (dependant)

Punctuated equalibrium - long periods of no evolution followed by intense periods of massive die offs and quick changing evolution



Get 2 Months for $5!