Clinical Practice Evaluations

20435664 

Christopher Wood 

Tiffanie Townley 

PROGRAM: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Bachelor of Science in Elementary Education and Special Education 

COURSE: _____________________________________________________ EED-480NB 

START DATE: ____________________________ 11/4/2019 

END DATE: _____________________ 

1/12/2020 

COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

West Jackson Elementary School 

SCHOOL STATE: ___________________________________ 

Georgia 

COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME: _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

****Please note: a separate score addendum will be issued to the Teacher Candidate within 24 business hours of submitting this evaluation that will display the total points and percentage. The Teacher Candidate must submit both the Clinical Practice Evaluation #4 and the score addendum to Student Teaching course.**** 

00 0 

Rebecca Norris 

284.73 

94.91 

43 

4300 

4081 300 0 

0 300 0 

00 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

0000 

0 0 

provement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASM Standard 6 a: General Studies Score d. Candidates are expected to have awareness that multiple disciplinary perspectives and techniques are available to consider all issues and responsibilities including, but not limited to, history, culture, moral and ethical issues, and decision-making 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the TeacherCLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

95 

95Teacher candidate respects all diversity within the school. She is proactive and sensitive to individual learning and the social needs of students. 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this disposition or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this disposition and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

High Expectations Score Teacher candidates should believe that all students could learn and should set and support realistic expectations for student success. These expectations should be communicated in positive ways. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) Teacher candidate has high expectations for all students. She adjusts lessons in order to support student success to reach student outcomes. 

Respect for the Diversity of Others Score Teacher candidates should be sensitive to individual learning and the social needs of students and embrace the cultural diversity of the community. They should develop and maintain educational communities marked by respect for others. They should interact with their students, fellow educators, administrators, parents, and other community members with courtesy and civility and establish relationships characterized by respect and rapport. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

95 

Teacher candidate makes sure all students are being treated fairly. She discusses with cooperating teacher when an issue may arise. She works with, and is aware of, and responsible for all students 

95Teacher candidate conducts professionalism on an ongoing basis. Students recognize her caring attitude . She shows patience, listens, and responds appropriately to students with positive feedback. 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this disposition or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this disposition and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Fairness Score Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality, and exercise fairness in all areas including assessment. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Professional Conduct Score Teacher candidates should exercise sound judgment and ethical behavior. They should be a positive role model within their community. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

9595 

Teacher candidate is consistently asking questions to cooperating teacher to make sure she is reaching all students. She seeks ways to revise her lessons and is driven to improve student success. 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this disposition or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this disposition and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Reflection Score Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a professional. Educators should be thoughtful about their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek continual improvement. 

Evidence ((The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) Teacher candidate is consistently asking questions to cooperating teacher to make sure she is reaching all students. She seeks was to revise her lessons and is driven to improve student success. 

Curiosity Score Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry. Evidence 

(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this disposition or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

95 The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this disposition and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Honesty Score Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Compassion Score Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their relationships with others while providing intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

95 

Teacher candidate is honest and will hold conversations with students whether academic or behavioral. She has done a great job build rapport with students and colleagues. 

Teacher candidate makes sure students needs are met. She shows a friendliness, warmth, and caring attitude while providing support for all students. 

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this disposition or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

95 

95Teacher candidate is dedicated and committed to the teaching profession. Cooperating teacher feels she has done a great job. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this disposition and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this disposition and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Advocacy Score Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the welfare of others in the educational setting. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) Teacher candidate is an advocate for student and the school. She is passionate about being a servant leader for her school and students. 

Dedication Score Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

9595 

Teacher candidate creates opportunities for students to participate in classroom activities. She collaborates with parents on a regular basis to promote student growth and development. Tiffanie provides appropriate instruction for students to accelerate their learning. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 1: Student Development Score 1.1 Teacher candidates create developmentally appropriate instruction that takes into account individual students’ strengths, interests, and needs and enables each student to advance and accelerate his or her learning. 1.2 Teacher candidates collaborate with families, communities, colleagues, and other professionals to promote student growth and development. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

95 9595 

Teacher candidate observes and monitors all students' learning during the lesson and provides visuals to help make connections. . Tiffanie collaborates with cooperating teacher to differentiate the instruction. She utilizes resources to assist students to meet their needs. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 2: Learning Differences Score 2.1 Teacher candidates design, adapt, and deliver instruction to address each student’s diverse learning strengths and needs and create opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning in different ways. 2.2 Teacher candidates incorporate language development tools into planning and instruction, including strategies for making content accessible to English language students and for evaluating and supporting their development of English proficiency. 2.3 Teacher candidates access resources, supports, specialized assistance and services to meet particular learning differences or needs. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

95 

95Teacher candidate manages the learning environment and demonstrates respect for all students. Students are aware and understand the expectations of the classroom. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 3: Learning Environments Score 3.1 Teacher candidates manage the learning environment to actively and equitably engage students by organizing, allocating, and coordinating the resources of time, space, and students’ attention. 3.2 Teacher candidates communicate verbally and nonverbally in ways that demonstrate respect for and responsiveness to the cultural backgrounds and differing perspectives students bring to the learning environment. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

95 

9395 

Teacher candidate creates opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master the math word problem. She links prior content knowledge to new concepts and helps students to make a connection. Students were allowed opportunities to learn, practice, and master the math problem. 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 4: Content Knowledge Score 4.1 Teacher candidates stimulate student reflection on prior content knowledge, link new concepts to familiar concepts, and make connections to students’ experiences. 4.2 Teacher candidates use supplementary resources and technologies effectively to ensure accessibility and relevance for all students. 4.3 Teacher candidates create opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master academic language in their content area. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

9595 

Teacher candidate allows students to generate ways to learn math word problems. Students were able to apply content knowledge to real- world problems. 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 5: Application of Content Score 5.1 Teacher candidates engage students in applying content knowledge to real-world problems through the lens of interdisciplinary themes (e.g., financial literacy, environmental literacy). 5.2 Teacher candidates facilitate students’ ability to develop diverse social and cultural perspectives that expand their understanding of local and global issues and create novel approaches to solving problems. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

959595 

Teacher candidate analyzes assessment results to design future lesson plans based on the results. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 6: Assessment Score 6.1 Teacher candidates design assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimize sources of bias that can distort assessment results. 6.2 Teacher candidates work independently and collaboratively to examine test and other performance data to understand each student’s progress and to guide planning. 6.3 Teacher candidates prepare all students for the demands of particular assessment formats and make appropriate modifications in assessments or testing conditions especially for students with disabilities and language learning needs. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

9595 

95Teacher candidate plans for instruction and utilizes prior student knowledge for the math word problem. Students were able to demonstrate multiple ways to demonstrate knowledge and skill. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 7: Planning for Instruction Score 7.1 Teacher candidates plan how to achieve each student’s learning goals, choosing appropriate strategies and accommodations, resources, and materials to differentiate instruction for individuals and groups of students. 7.2 Teacher candidates develop appropriate sequencing of learning experiences and provide multiple ways to demonstrate knowledge and skill. 7.3 Teacher candidates plan for instruction based on formative and summative assessment data, prior student knowledge, and student interest. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

95 

9395Teacher candidate facilitates and guides students to meet the lesson objectives. She observes students practicing. Tiffanie poses higher order thinking questions that help students analyze the why, and how. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 8: Instructional Strategies Score 8.1 Teacher candidates vary their role in the instructional process (e.g., instructor, facilitator, coach, audience) in relation to the content, purpose of instruction, and student needs 8.2 Teacher candidates engage students in using a range of learning skills and technology tools to access, interpret, evaluate, and apply information. 8.3 Teacher candidates ask questions to stimulate discussion that serve different purposes (e.g., probing for student understanding, helping students articulate their ideas and thinking processes, stimulating curiosity, and helping students to question). 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

9595 

Teacher candidate continues to work with cooperating teacher for support, feedback, and guidance. Formative and summative assessment data is used to drive instruction along with setting learning goals and tracking progress for students. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Score 9.1 Independently and in collaboration with colleagues, teacher candidates use a variety of data (e.g., systematic observation, information about students, and research) to evaluate the outcomes of teaching and learning and to adapt planning and practice. 9.2 Teacher candidates actively seek professional, community, and technological resources, within and outside the school, as supports for analysis, reflection, and problem solving. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

95 

95Teacher candidate understands the needs of each student in the class and makes changes when necessary. She works to find appropriate learning styles for each individual learner, and makes modifications and accommodations to help each student succeed. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 10: Leadership and Collaboration Score 10.1 Teacher candidates use technological tools and a variety of communication strategies to build local and global learning communities that engage students, families, and colleagues. 10.2 Teacher candidates advocate to meet the needs of students, to strengthen the learning environment, and to enact system change. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

100 

Teacher candidate demonstrates and understanding of their impact on student learning through EdTPA and other formative and summative assessments. 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

No Evidence 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Grand Canyon University: Impact on Student Learning Score No Evidence Teacher candidates demonstrate an understanding of their impact on student learning as evidenced in the Student Teaching Evaluation of Performance (STEP) and other formative and summative assessments. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Grand Canyon University: Impact on Student Learning No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Specialized Professional Associations (SPA) Standards Instructions 

Please use the chart below to determine the required SPA standards for your Teacher Candidate’s program of study. If your Teacher Candidate’s program is not included below, the evaluation of SPA standards are not required. 

Program Specialized Professional Associations (SPA) 

Dance NASD National Association of Schools of Dance Early Childhood NAEYC National Association for the Education of Young Children Early Childhood and Early Childhood Special Education NAEYC National Association for the Education of Young Children 

CEC Council for Exceptional Children Elementary ACEI Association of Childhood Education International Elementary (ESL Emphasis) ACEI Association of Childhood Education International 

TESOL Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Elementary and Special Education ACEI Association of Childhood Education International 

CEC Council for Exceptional Children Music NASM National Association of Schools of Music Secondary- Business NBEA National Business Education Association Secondary- English NCTE National Council of Teachers of English Secondary- History NCSS National Council for the Social Studies Secondary- Math NCTM National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Secondary- Physical Education SHAPE Society of Health and Physical Educators- America Secondary- Science NSTA National Science Teachers Association Special Education CEC Council for Exceptional Children Theatre NAST National Association of Schools of Theatre 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

NASD 3a Score Ability to teach dance at various levels to different age groups and in a variety of classroom, studio, and ensemble settings in ways that develop knowledge of how dance works syntactically as a communication medium and developmentally as an agent of civilization. This set of abilities includes effective classroom, studio, and rehearsal management. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASD 3b Score An understanding of child growth and development and an understanding of principles of learning as they relate to dance. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Dance Placements: National Association of Schools of Dance (NASD) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Dance Placements: National Association of Schools of Dance (NASD) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NASD 3c Score The ability to assess aptitudes, experiential backgrounds, orientations of individuals and groups of students, and the nature of subject matter, and to plan educational programs to meet assessed needs. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASD 3d Score Knowledge of current methods, materials, and repertories available in various fields and levels of dance education appropriate to the teaching specialization. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASD 3e Score The ability to accept, amend, or reject methods and materials based on personal assessment of specific teaching situations. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASD 3f Score Basic understanding of the principles and methods of developing curricula and the short- and long-term units that comprise them. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Dance Placements: National Association of Schools of Dance (NASD) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NASD 3g Score An understanding of evaluative techniques and ability to apply them in assessing both the progress of students in dance and the objectives and procedures of the curriculum. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASD 5a Score Students should engage in observation and discussion of field-based teaching/learning experiences in diverse settings. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASD 5b Score Students should be provided opportunities for various types of teaching and directed observation throughout the degree program. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASD 5c Score Teaching opportunities should be provided in actual pre-kindergarten, kindergarten, elementary, middle, and secondary settings, as appropriate for the student’s certification level. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Dance Placements: National Association of Schools of Dance (NASD) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NASD 5d Score The choice of practice teaching sites must enable students to develop competencies consistent with standards outlined above, and must be approved by qualified dance personnel from the degree-granting institution. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASD 5e Score Sites and situations for student teaching and students must be supervised by qualified dance personnel from the degree-granting institution and, when possible, the cooperating schools. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide 

No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

NAEYC Standard 1: Promoting Child Development and Learning Score Students prepared in early childhood degree programs are grounded in a child development knowledge base. They use their understanding of young children’s characteristics and needs and of the multiple interacting influences on children’s development and learning to create environments that are healthy, respectful, supportive, and challenging for each child. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NAEYC Standard 2: Building Family and Community Relationships Score Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that successful early childhood education depends upon partnerships with children’s families and communities. They know about, understand, and value the importance and complex characteristics of children’s families and communities. They use this understanding to create respectful, reciprocal relationships that support and empower families and to involve all families in their children’s development and learning. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NAEYC Standard 3: Observing, Documenting, and Assessing to Support Young Children and Families Score Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that child observations, documentation, and other forms of assessment are central to the practice of all early childhood professionals. They know about and understand the goals, benefits, and uses of assessment. They know about and use systematic observations, documentation, and other effective assessment strategies in a responsible way, in partnership with families and other professionals, to positively influence the development of every child. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NAEYC Standard 4: Using Developmentally Effective Approaches to Connect with Children and Families Score Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that teaching and learning with young children is a complex enterprise, and its details vary depending on children’s ages, characteristics, and the settings within which teaching and learning occur. They understand and use positive relationships and supportive interactions as the foundation for their work with young children and families. Students know, understand, and use a wide array of developmentally appropriate approaches, instructional strategies, and tools to connect with children and families and positively influence each child’s development and learning. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NAEYC Standard 5: Using Content Knowledge to Build Meaningful Curriculum Score Students prepared in early childhood degree programs use their knowledge of academic disciplines to design, implement, and evaluate experiences that promote positive development and learning for each and every young child. Students understand the importance of developmental domains and academic (or content) disciplines in an early childhood curriculum. They know the essential concepts, inquiry tools, and structure of content areas, including academic subjects, and can identify resources to deepen their understanding. Students use their own knowledge and other resources to design, implement, and evaluate meaningful, challenging curricula that promote comprehensive developmental and learning outcomes for every young child. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NAEYC Standard 6: Becoming a Professional Score Students prepared in early childhood degree programs identify and conduct themselves as members of the early childhood profession. They know and use ethical guidelines and other professional standards related to early childhood practice. They are continuous, collaborative learners who demonstrate knowledgeable, reflective, and critical perspectives on their work, making informed decisions that integrate knowledge from a variety of sources. They are informed advocates for sound educational practices and policies. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NAEYC Standard 7: Early Childhood Experience Score Field experiences and clinical practice are planned and sequenced so that candidates develop the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions necessary to promote the development and learning of young children across the entire developmental period of early childhood – in at least two of the three early childhood age groups (birth – age 3, 3 through 5, 5 through 8 years) and in the variety of settings that offer early education (early school grades, child care centers and homes, Head Start programs). 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

CEC Standard 1: Learner Development and Individual Learning Differences Score Beginning special education professionals understand how exceptionalities may interact with development and learning and use this knowledge to provide meaningful and challenging learning experiences for individuals with exceptionalities. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CEC Standard 2: Learning Environments Score Beginning special education professionals create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning environments so that individuals with exceptionalities become active and effective learners and develop emotional well-being, positive social interactions, and self-determination. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

CEC Standard 3: Curricular Content Knowledge Score Beginning special education professionals use knowledge of general and specialized curricula to individualize learning for individuals with exceptionalities. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CEC Standard 4: Assessment Score Beginning special education professionals use multiple methods of assessment and data sources in making educational decisions. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CEC Standard 5: Instructional Planning and Strategies Score Beginning special education professionals select, adapt, and use a repertoire of evidence-based instructional strategies to advance learning of individuals with exceptionalities. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

CEC Standard 6: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Score Beginning special education professionals use foundational knowledge of the field and their professional ethical principles and practice standards to inform special education practice, to engage in lifelong learning, and to advance the profession. Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CEC Standard 7: Collaboration Score Beginning special education professionals collaborate with families, other educators, related service providers, individuals with exceptionalities, and personnel from community agencies in culturally responsive ways to address the needs of individuals with exceptionalities across a range of learning experiences. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

95 

95Teacher candidate has worked with reading workshop (MAPP testing), leads mini-lessons, and group or independent work. She leads the writing workshop which includes mini-lessons and writing time. She sets conferences will students and the discourse. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

ACEI Standard 1: Development, Learning, and Motivation Score Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts, principles, theories, and research related to development of children and young adolescents to construct learning opportunities that support individual students’ development, acquisition of knowledge, and motivation. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) Teacher candidate is able to take feedback from cooperating teacher and learn new information along with making adjustments for student learning. Works with cooperating teacher of what has worked and what needs improvement. ACEI Standard 2.1: Reading, Writing, and Oral Language Score Candidates demonstrate a high level of competence in the use of English language arts and they know, understand, and use concepts from reading, language and child development, to teach reading, writing, speaking, viewing, listening, and thinking skills and to help students successfully apply their developing skills to many different situations, materials, and ideas. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

ACEI Standard 2.2: Science Score Candidates know, understand, and use fundamental concepts of physical, life, and earth/ space sciences. Candidates can design and implement age- appropriate inquiry lessons to teach science, to build student understanding for personal and social applications, and to convey the nature of science. 

95Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) Teacher candidate is getting STEAM accredited. Also working with PBL with students and the design thinking process on how to increase pollination count for the surrounding area. She has researched and documented her work to provide more opportunities for student success. 

ACEI Standard 2.3: Mathematics Score Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts and procedures that define number and operations, algebra, geometry, measurement, and data analysis and probability. In doing so they consistently engage problem solving, reasoning and proof, communication, connections and representation. 

95 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) Teacher candidate has been running the math workshop, Mini lessons then level groups - working with learning continuum working on groups bsaed on their perfomrance on the MAPP data. Working with students on second grade standards. Group and independent work. CGI's helps students with work problems during the STEAM time. 

ACEI Standard 2.4: Social Studies Score Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts and modes of inquiry from the social studies—the integrated study of history, geography, the social sciences, and other related areas—to promote elementary students’ abilities to make informed decisions as citizens of a culturally diverse democratic society and interdependent world. 

95Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) Cherokee Indians engaged activities to build is a concept used in social studies. Teacher candidate understands curriculum of social studies and how to engage students in a diverse society. 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

ACEI Standard 2.5: The Arts Score Candidates know, understand, and use—as appropriate to their own understanding and skills—the content, functions, and achievements of the performing arts (dance, music, theater) and the visual arts as primary media for communication, inquiry, and engagement among elementary students. 

95Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) Arts included in the STEAM project. Art component developed through the PBL project. 

ACEI Standard 2.6: Health Education Score Candidates know, understand, and use the major concepts in the subject matter of health education to create opportunities for student development and practice of skills that contribute to good health. 

95 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) PBIS uses character development - mini lessons once a week, healthy habits, character traits. 

ACEI Standard 2.7: Physical Education Score Candidates know, understand, and use—as appropriate to their own understanding and skills—human movement and physical activity as central elements to foster active, healthy life styles and enhanced quality of life for elementary students. 95Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) Students during recess time use appropriate movement and physical education activities. 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

ACEI Standard 3.1: Integrating and Applying Knowledge for Instruction Score Candidates plan and implement instruction based on knowledge of students, learning theory, connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, and community 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

ACEI Standard 3.2: Adaptation to Diverse Students Score Candidates understand how elementary students differ in their development and approaches to learning, and create instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse students. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

ACEI Standard 3.3: Development of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Score Candidates understand and use a variety of teaching strategies that encourage elementary students’ development of critical thinking and problem solving. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

ACEI Standard 3.4: Active Engagement in Learning Score Candidates use their knowledge and understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior among students at the K-6 level to foster active engagement in learning, self-motivation, and positive social interaction and to create supportive learning environments. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

ACEI Standard 3.5: Communication to Foster Collaboration Score Candidates use their knowledge and understanding of effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques to foster active inquiry, collaboration, and supportive interaction in the elementary classroom. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

ACEI Standard 4: Assessment for Instruction Score Candidates know, understand, and use formal and informal assessment strategies to plan, evaluate and strengthen instruction that will promote continuous intellectual, social, emotional, and physical development of each elementary student. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

ACEI Standard 5.1: Professional Growth, Reflection And Evaluation Score Candidates are aware of and reflect on their practice in light of research on teaching, professional ethics, and resources available for professional learning; they continually evaluate the effects of their professional decisions and actions on students, families, and other professionals in the learning community and actively seek out opportunities to grow professionally. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide 

No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

The performance of the 

The performance of the 

The performance of the 

The performance of the 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is 

Teacher Candidate is 

Teacher Candidate is 

Teacher Candidate meets 

Teacher Candidate insufficient in meeting this 

underdeveloped in meeting 

developing in meeting this 

this standard and 

consistently exceeds this standard and expectations 

this standard and 

standard and expectations 

expectations for a Teacher 

standard and all for a Teacher Candidate 

expectations for a Teacher 

for a Teacher Candidate 

Candidate during student 

expectations for a Teacher during student teaching. 

Candidate during student 

during student teaching. 

teaching. 

Candidate during student teaching. 

teaching. 

Standard 1.a. Language as a System Score Candidates demonstrate understanding of language as a system, including phonology, morphology, syntax, pragmatics and semantics, and support ELLs as they acquire English language and literacy in order to achieve in the content areas. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 1.b. Language Acquisition and Development Score Candidates understand and apply theories and research in language acquisition and development to support their ELLs English language and literacy learning and content-area achievement. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard 2. Culture as It Affects Student Learning Score Candidates know, understand, and use major theories and research related to the nature and role of culture in their instruction. They demonstrate understanding of how cultural groups and individual cultural identities affect language learning and school achievement. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 3.a. Planning for Standards-Based ESL and Content Instruction Score Candidates know, understand, and apply concepts, research, and best practices to plan classroom instruction in a supportive learning environment for ELLs. They plan for multilevel classrooms with learners from diverse backgrounds using standards-based ESL and content curriculum. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 3.b. Implementing and Managing Standards-Based ESL and Content Instruction Score Candidates know, manage, and implement a variety of standards-based teaching strategies and techniques for developing and integrating English listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Candidates support ELLs access to the core curriculum by teaching language through academic content. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard 3.c. Using Resources and Technology Effectively in ESL and Content Instruction Score Candidates are familiar with a wide range of standards-based materials, resources, and technologies, and choose, adapt, and use them in effective ESL and content teaching. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 4.a. Issues of Assessment for English Language Learners Score Candidates demonstrate understanding of various assessment issues as they affect ELLs, such as accountability, bias, special education testing, language proficiency, and accommodations in formal testing situations. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 4.b. Language Proficiency Assessment Score Candidates know and can use a variety of standards-based language proficiency instruments to show language growth and to inform their instruction. They demonstrate understanding of their uses for identification, placement, and reclassification of ELLs. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard 4.c. Classroom-Based Assessment for ESL Score Candidates know and can use a variety of performance-based assessment tools and techniques to inform instruction in the classroom. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 5.a. ESL Research and History Score Candidates demonstrate knowledge of history, research, educational public policy, and current practice in the field of ESL teaching and apply this knowledge to inform teaching and learning. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 5.b. Professional Development, Partnerships, and Advocacy Score Candidates take advantage of professional growth opportunities and demonstrate the ability to build partnerships with colleagues and students’ families, serve as community resources, and advocate for ELLs. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

NASM Standard 6 a: General Studies Score a. Candidates are expected to have the ability to think, speak, and write clearly and effectively. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NASM Standard 6 a: General Studies Score b. Candidates are expected to have an informed acquaintance with fields of study beyond music such as those in the arts and humanities, the natural and physical sciences, and the social sciences. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Music Placements: National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Music Placements: National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NASM Standard 6 a: General Studies Score c. Candidates are expected to have a functional awareness of the differences and commonalities regarding work in artistic, scientific, and humanistic domains. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for im Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard B 1: Common Body of Knowledge and Skills – Performance Score Students must acquire: a. Technical skills requisite for artistic self-expression in at least one major performance area at a level appropriate for the particular music concentration. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Music Placements: National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard B 1: Common Body of Knowledge and Skills – Performance Score Students must acquire: b. An overview understanding of the repertory in their major performance area and the ability to perform from a cross-section of that repertory. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard B 1: Common Body of Knowledge and Skills – Performance Score Students must acquire: c. The ability to read at sight with fluency demonstrating both general musicianship and, in the major performance area, a level of skill relevant to professional standards appropriate for the particular music concentration. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard B 1: Common Body of Knowledge and Skills – Performance Score Students must acquire: d. Knowledge and skills sufficient to work as a leader and in collaboration on matters of musical interpretation. Rehearsal and conducting skills are required as appropriate to the particular music concentration. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Music Placements: National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard B 1: Common Body of Knowledge and Skills – Performance Score Students must acquire: e. Keyboard competency. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard B 1: Common Body of Knowledge and Skills – Performance Score Students must acquire: f. Growth in artistry, technical skills, collaborative competence and knowledge of repertory through regular ensemble experiences. Ensembles should be varied both in size and nature. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard B 2: Musicianship Skills and Analysis Score Students must acquire: a. An understanding of the common elements and organizational patterns of music and their interaction, the ability to employ this understanding in aural, verbal, and visual analyses, and the ability to take aural dictation. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Music Placements: National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard B 2: Musicianship Skills and Analysis Score Students must acquire: b. Sufficient understanding of and capability with musical forms, processes, and structures to use this knowledge and skill in compositional, performance, analytical, scholarly, and pedagogical applications according to the requisites of their specializations. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard B 2: Musicianship Skills and Analysis Score Students must acquire: c. The ability to place music in historical, cultural, and stylistic contexts. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard B 3: Composition/Improvisation Score Students must acquire a rudimentary capacity to create original or derivative music. It is the prerogative of each institution to develop specific requirements regarding written, electronic, or improvisatory forms and methods. These may include, but are not limited to, the creation of original compositions or improvisations, variations, or improvisations on existing materials, experimentation with various sound sources, the imitation of musical styles, and manipulating the common elements in non-traditional ways. Institutional requirements should help students gain a basic understanding of how to work freely and cogently with musical materials in various composition-based activities, particularly those most associated with the major field. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Music Placements: National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard B 4: History and Repertory Score Students must acquire basic knowledge of music history and repertories through the present time, including study and experience of musical language and achievement in addition to that of the primary culture encompassing the area of specialization (see Standards III.L.). 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard B 5: Synthesis Score While synthesis is a lifetime process, by the end of undergraduate study students must be able to work on musical problems by combining, as appropriate to the issue, their capabilities in performance; aural, verbal, and visual analysis; composition/improvisation; and history and repertory. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Business Placements: National Business Education Association (NBEA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

Standard 1: Professionalism Score 1.1 Prospective business teachers reflect on and continually evaluates the effects of his or her choices and actions on others and actively seeks out opportunities for personal and professional growth. 1.2 Prospective business teachers care deeply about students, colleagues, the business educations discipline, and the teaching profession. 1.3 Prospective business teachers embrace teaching as lifelong learning to model best practices in instruction. 1.4 Prospective business teachers participates actively in professional organizations at all levels and seeks opportunities to serve in leadership and advocacy roles. 1.5 Prospective business teachers contribute to the well-being of the school, school district, and community. 

1.6 Prospective business teachers move beyond the boundaries of the classroom to assume responsibility as an advocate and promoter of the profession in the community, state, and nation. 1.7 Prospective business teachers projects a positive professional image that personifies the discipline itself and exemplifies the goals and ideals of the profession. 1.8 Prospective business teachers base all interaction on principles of respect, fairness, and ethics. 1.9 Prospective business teachers articulates the importance of professional standards in program development. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Business Placements: National Business Education Association (NBEA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard 2: Curriculum Development Score 2.1 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes content related to education for and about business. 

2.2 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that reflect local, state, and national standards. 

2.3 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that consists of achievement standards, performance expectations, and assessment. 

2.4 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that consists of sequential integrated learning experiences. 

2.5 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that provides for delivery of content in a developmentally appropriate manner. 

2.6 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes the development of knowledge, skills and attitudes. 

2.7 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that encourages students to use reflective thinking, problem solving, and other higher level thinking skills. 

2.8 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes multidisciplinary approaches. 

2.9 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that serves the needs of diverse populations. 

2.10 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that enables students to make a transition from school to career. 

2.11 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that focuses on continuous quality education. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Business Placements: National Business Education Association (NBEA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard 3: Instruction Score 3.1 Prospective business teachers use self-directed learning to help students gain access to knowledge, direct their own learning, and learn how to learn. 

3.2 Prospective business teachers employ a variety of instructional strategies to engage all students in the learning process. 

3.3 Prospective business teachers facilitate collaborative learning that may include students, teachers, business and community representatives, and others. 

3.4 Prospective business teachers demonstrate effective communication skills to facilitate learning. 

3.5 Prospective business teachers help all students realize their full potential. 

3.6 Prospective business teachers use a variety of media to enhance and expand learning opportunities. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 4: Assessment Score 4.1 Prospective business teachers develop formative and summative assessments linked to achievement standards and performance expectations for learning. 

4.2 Prospective business teachers use multiple forms of assessment to obtain accurate measures of student progress including formal, informal and authentic measures. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Business Placements: National Business Education Association (NBEA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard 5: Classroom Environment Score 5.1 Prospective business teachers establish and maintain a classroom environment based on rapport and respect. 

5.2 Prospective business teachers promote a culture for learning. 

5.3 Prospective business teachers develop and implement classroom procedures. 

5.4 Prospective business teachers manage student behavior. 

5.5 Prospective business teachers organize physical space. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 6: Student Organizations Score 

6.1 Prospective business teachers support the student organization to provide an environment in which students grow professionally, personally, and socially. 

6.2 Prospective business teachers recognize that the student organization provides opportunities to involve the business and professional community in support of the goals of the business education program. 

6.3 Prospective business teachers recognize that the student-directed operation of the organization provides opportunities for personal growth and leadership development. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Business Placements: National Business Education Association (NBEA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard 7: Score 7.1 Prospective business teachers base all communication on principles of respect, fairness, and honesty, and understands that building relationships depends on these foundations. 

7.2 Prospective business teachers exhibit an understanding of communication as a dynamic system of people, processes, cultures, media, and fluid boundaries in developing strategies. 

7.3 Prospective business teachers demonstrate effective communication skills to facilitate learning. 

7.4 Prospective business teachers incorporate quality standards in all forms of communication. 

7.5 Prospective business teachers serve as an ambassador for business education with all stakeholders. 

7.6 Prospective business teachers recognize that culture impacts business communication. 

7.7 Prospective business teachers use a variety of media to enhance and expand communication opportunities. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Business Placements: National Business Education Association (NBEA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard 8: Score 8.1 Prospective business teachers communicate effectively with all stakeholders by understanding communication as a dynamic system of people, cultures, and media. 

8.2 Prospective business teachers recognize that student achievement is a collaborative effort among a variety of stakeholders. 

8.3 Prospective business teachers build professional relationships with stakeholders to create a learning environment in which students move continuously and easily between school and community to facilitate the learning process. 

8.4 Prospective business teachers develop partnerships with members of the educational, business and other communities to improve programs, develop new programs, provide student access to learning to learning opportunities, and ensure a curriculum based on real world experiences. 

8.5 Prospective business teachers build professional relationships with all stakeholders based on trust, respect, ethical standards, and mutual benefits to earn commitment, dedicated involvement, visible advocacy, and financial support. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Standard 9: Score 9.1 Prospective business teachers assist students in adjusting to and functioning effectively in educational and business environments. 

9.2 Prospective business teachers help students discover their potential for intellectual, personal, social and emotional growth. 

9.3 Prospective business teachers help students make decisions regarding careers and career transitions. 

9.4 Prospective business teachers collaborate with student support services when appropriate. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Business Placements: National Business Education Association (NBEA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

Standard 10: Score 10.1 Prospective business teachers study a broad range of business content areas including accounting, business law, career development, communication, computation, economics & personal finance, entrepreneurship, information technology, international business, management, marketing, and the interrelatedness of business functions. 10.2 Prospective business teachers develop knowledge and competencies in written and oral communication: values, ethics, and social responsibilities; quantitative skills; contributions of all segments of society; human behavior, cultural differences; and a global perspective. 

10.3 Prospective business teachers demonstrate the knowledge and skills in educational foundations, teaching-learning theory, learning styles, exceptionalities, instructional strategies, assessment techniques, and field experiences to effectively teach business education. 

10.4 Prospective business teachers gain real life experience in the application of business knowledge and skills. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

NCTE Standard 1: English Language Arts (ELA) Candidate Program Structure Score Candidates follow a specific curriculum and are expected to meet appropriate performance assessments for preservice English language arts teachers. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTE Standard 2: ELA Candidate Attitudes Score Through modeling, advisement, instruction, field experiences, assessment of performance, and involvement in professional organizations, candidates adopt and strengthen professional attitudes needed by English language arts teachers. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

English Placements: National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

English Placements: National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NCTE Standard 3: ELA Candidate Knowledge Score Candidates are knowledgeable about language; literature; oral, visual, and written literacy; print and nonprint media; technology; and research theory and findings. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTE Standard 4: ELA Candidate Pedagogy Score Candidates acquire and demonstrate the dispositions and skills needed to integrate knowledge of English language arts, students, and teaching. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

NCSS Theme 1: Culture and Cultural Diversity Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of culture and cultural diversity. Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCSS Theme 2: Time, Continuity, and Change Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of time, continuity, and change. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NCSS Theme 3: People, Places, and Environments Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of people, places, and environments. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCSS Theme 4: Individual Development and Identity Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of individual development and identity. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCSS Theme 5: Individuals, Groups, and Institutions Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of interactions among individuals, groups, and institutions. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NCSS Theme 6: Power, Authority, and Governance Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of power, authority, and governance. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCSS Theme 7: Production, Distribution, and Consumption Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of how people organize for the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCSS Theme 8: Science, Technology, and Society Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of science, technology, and society. Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NCSS Theme 9: Global Connections Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of global connections and interdependence. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCSS Theme 10: Civic Ideals and Practices Score Social studies teachers should possess the knowledge, capabilities, and dispositions to organize and provide instruction at the appropriate school level for the study of civic ideals and practices. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Math Placements: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

NCTM Standard 1: Knowledge of Mathematical Problem Solving Score Candidates know, understand, and apply the process of mathematical problem solving. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 2: Knowledge of Reasoning and Proof Score Candidates reason, construct, and evaluate mathematical arguments and develop an appreciation for mathematical rigor and inquiry 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Math Placements: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NCTM Standard 3: Knowledge of Mathematical Communication Score Candidates communicate their mathematical thinking orally and in writing to peers, faculty, and others. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 4: Knowledge of Mathematical Connections Score Candidates recognize, use, and make connections between and among mathematical ideas and in contexts outside mathematics to build mathematical understanding. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 5: Knowledge of Mathematical Representation Score Candidates use varied representations of mathematical ideas to support and deepen students’ mathematical understanding. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Math Placements: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NCTM Standard 6: Knowledge of Technology Score Candidates embrace technology as an essential tool for teaching and learning mathematics. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 7: Dispositions Score Candidates support a positive disposition toward mathematical processes and mathematical learning. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 8: Knowledge of Mathematics Pedagogy Score Candidates possess a deep understanding of how students learn mathematics and of the pedagogical knowledge specific to mathematics teaching and learning. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Math Placements: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NCTM Standard 9: Knowledge of Number and Operation Score Candidates demonstrate computational proficiency, including a conceptual understanding of numbers, ways of representing numbers, relationships among number and number systems, and meanings of operations. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 10: Knowledge of Different Perspectives on Algebra Score Candidates emphasize relationships among quantities including functions, ways of representing mathematical relationships, and the analysis of change. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 11: Knowledge of Geometries Score Candidates use spatial visualization and geometric modeling to explore and analyze geometric shapes, structures, and their properties. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Math Placements: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NCTM Standard 12: Knowledge of Calculus Score Candidates demonstrate a conceptual understanding of limit, continuity, differentiation, and integration and a thorough background in the techniques and application of the calculus. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 13: Knowledge of Discrete Mathematics Score Candidates apply the fundamental ideas of discrete mathematics in the formulation and solution of problems. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 14: Knowledge of Data Analysis, Statistics, and Probability Score Candidates demonstrate an understanding of concepts and practices related to data analysis, statistics, and probability. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NCTM Standard 15: Knowledge of Measurement Score Candidates apply and use measurement concepts and tools. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Physical Education Placements: Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

SHAPE: Standard 1 Score The physically literate individual demonstrates competency in a variety of motor skills and movement patterns. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

SHAPE: Standard 2 Score The physically literate individual applies knowledge of concepts, principles, strategies and tactics related to movement and performance. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Physical Education Placements: Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

SHAPE: Standard 3 Score The physically literate individual demonstrates the knowledge and skills to achieve and maintain a health-enhancing level of physical activity and fitness. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

SHAPE: Standard 4 Score The physically literate individual exhibits responsible personal and social behavior that respects self and others. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

SHAPE: Standard 5 Score The physically literate individual recognizes the value of physical activity for health, enjoyment, challenge, self-expression and/or social interaction. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

NSTA Standard 1: Content Score Teachers of science understand and can articulate the knowledge and practices of contemporary science. They can interrelate and interpret important concepts, ideas, and applications in their fields of licensure; and can conduct scientific investigations. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NSTA Standard 2: Nature of Science Score Teachers of science engage students effectively in studies of the history, philosophy, and practice of science. They enable students to distinguish science from nonscience, understand the evolution and practice of science as a human endeavor, and critically analyze assertions made in the name of science. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

Science Placements: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Science Placements: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NSTA Standard 3: Inquiry Score Teachers of science engage students both in studies of various methods of scientific inquiry and in active learning through scientific inquiry. They encourage students, individually and collaboratively, to observe, ask questions, design inquiries, and collect and interpret data in order to develop concepts and relationships from empirical experiences. Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NSTA Standard 4: Issues Score Teachers of science recognize that informed citizens must be prepared to make decisions and take action on contemporary science- and technology-related issues of interest to the general society. They require students to conduct inquiries into the factual basis of such issues and to assess possible actions and outcomes based upon their goals and values. Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NSTA Standard 5: General Skills of Teaching Score Teachers of science create a community of diverse learners who construct meaning from their science experience and possess a disposition for further exploration and learning. They use, and can justify, a variety of classroom arrangements, groupings, actions, strategies, and methodologies. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Science Placements: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NSTA Standard 6: Curriculum Score Teachers of science plan and implement an active, coherent, and effective curriculum that is consistent with the goals and recommendations of the National Science Education Standards. They begin with the end in mind and effectively incorporate contemporary practices and resources into their planning and teaching. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NSTA Standard 7: Science in the Community Score Teachers of science relate their discipline to their local and regional communities, involving stakeholders and using the individual, institutional, and natural resources of the community in their teaching. They actively engage students in science-related studies or activities related to locally important issues. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NSTA Standard 8: Assessment Score Teachers of science construct and use effective assessment strategies to determine the backgrounds and achievement of learners and facilitate their intellectual, social, and personal development. They assess students fairly and equitably, and require that students engage in ongoing self-assessment. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Science Placements: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NSTA Standard 9: Safety and Welfare Score Teachers of science organize safe and effective learning environments that promote the success of students and the welfare of all living things. They require and promote knowledge and respect for safety, and oversee the welfare of all living things used in the classroom or found in the field. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NSTA Standard 10: Professional Growth Score Teachers of science strive continuously to grow and change, personally and professionally, to meet the diverse needs of their students, school, community, and profession. They have a desire and disposition for growth and betterment. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Theatre Placements: National Association of Schools of Theatre (NAST) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective 

(Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Foundational (Teacher Candidates within this range require a Professional Growth Plan) 

Emerging (Teacher Candidates within this range may benefit from a Professional Growth Plan) 

Proficient (Target level for Teacher Candidates) 

Distinguished (Usually reserved for master Teacher Candidates) 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 There is no evidence that the performance of the Teacher Candidate met this standard or expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is insufficient in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is underdeveloped in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate is developing in meeting this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate meets this standard and expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

The performance of the Teacher Candidate consistently exceeds this standard and all expectations for a Teacher Candidate during student teaching. 

NAST Item 2a: Score An understanding of child development and the identification and understanding of psychological principles of learning as these relate to theatre education. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NAST Item 2b: Score An understanding of the philosophical and social foundation underlying theatre in education and the ability to express a rationale for personal attitudes and beliefs. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Theatre Placements: National Association of Schools of Theatre (NAST) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NAST Item 2c: Score An ability to assess aptitudes, experiential backgrounds, skills, and interests of individuals and groups of pupils, to devise learning experiences to meet assessed needs, and to manage classrooms and rehearsals effectively. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NAST Item 2d: Score Knowledge of current methods and materials available in all fields and levels of theatre education. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NAST Item 2e: Score An understanding of the principles and methods of developing curricula and the short- and long-term units that comprises them. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

20435664 Tiffanie Townley 

Theatre Placements: National Association of Schools of Theatre (NAST) Scoring Guide No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished 

0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100 

NAST Item 2f: Score An understanding of evaluative techniques and the ability to apply them in assessing both the progress of students and in the objectives and procedures of the curriculum. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

NAST Item 2g: Score An awareness of the need for continuing study, self-evaluation, and professional growth. 

Evidence (The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. ) 

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4 

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________ 

Specialized Tiffanie Townley 20435664 INSTRUCTIONS Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section. 

Total Scored Percentage: 

ATTACHMENTS Clinical Practice Time Log: (Required) (The GCU Faculty Supervisors should not submit the final evaluation until the Teacher Candidate has completed the number of days required by their program) Attachment 1: (Optional) 

Attachment 2: (Optional) 

AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE 

This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating / Mentor Teacher. The GCU Faculty Supervisor and Cooperating /Mentor Teacher should collaboratively review the performance in each category prior to the evaluation meeting. 

I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so. 

GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Dr. Chris Wood 

Date 

Dr. Chris Wood (Jan 12, 2020) SCORING SUMMARY GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners 

Professional Association Standards Score 

Score 94.91 95 95 1000 950 2371 

800 Jan 12, 2020 InTASC Standards Score 94.84 25